The mainstream media have held Dr. Anthony Fauci’s word as indisputable “science” since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This continued in the interviews he held with newspaper and television reporters as he prepared to leave office.1,2 Fauci recent…
The mainstream media have held Dr. Anthony Fauci’s word as indisputable “science” since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This continued in the interviews he held with newspaper and television reporters as he prepared to leave office.1,2 Fauci recently turned 82, and after 54 years working in the government, has left the National Institutes of Health at the end of 2022.
His nearly 40-year reign at the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) began in 1984,3 during which he walked America through HIV virus, Ebola, Zika and gain-of-function research. He is called the nation's top infectious disease doctor and throughout the pandemic referred to himself as the personification of science, claiming his statements should not be challenged or questioned.
In the first 18 months of the pandemic, Fauci was given ample opportunity to be truthful but instead engaged in what the online magazine Slate called “noble lies.”4 These fall under the category of paternalistic lies that are inaccurate representations of the situation. He may have chosen to do it to protect his decisions or to promote chaos and fear with the intent of manipulating the public.
He may have also been functioning under the delusion that he had the right and responsibility of making an assumption about whether the lies he told were in the best interest of those who have the full capacity and capability of understanding the science and making up their own mind. The COVID lies he told were far-reaching and infamously began in the early days of the pandemic about the effectiveness of wearing masks.
However, as I have documented in the last three years, his lies did not end there. During an interview in July 2021 with MSNBC,5 Fauci said within the space of four minutes that without a doubt, people can get infected after vaccination and carry enough virus to transmit the infection, but if the overwhelming majority of people were vaccinated the virus would be crushed.
The percentage of an ‘overwhelming majority’ continued to change throughout 2020. A New York Times article6 in December 2020 reported Fauci cited an estimate of up to 70% in the early months, later boosted it to 75% during television interviews, then up to 80% in December 2020 to a CNBC reporter.
The next day he admitted to The New York Times he was ‘moving the goal posts’ “partly based on new science and partly based on his gut feeling that the country is finally ready to hear what he really thinks.”
It should come as no surprise then that mainstream media reporters are not asking the hard questions and Fauci is not volunteering the information. After all, it must be difficult to remember everything he said in the last three years when the “truth” and “scientific evidence” that he told the public have not been consistent.
Exit Interviews Side-Step How Fauci Handled Public Health
In the final days of 2022, Fauci did an interview with the Los Angeles Times,7 during which he spoke with the reporter about the public health policies of the HIV and AIDS crisis and compared that to the COVID-19 pandemic. He was asked whether he thought the public failed to appreciate that science does not provide a quick and complete solution.
Yet, the timeline to produce the COVID-19 genetic shot was phenomenally fast.8 Where most vaccines have taken 10 to 15 years to be released to the public, Moderna reportedly received the DNA sequence of SARS-CoV-2 by the second week in January 2020 and designed and manufactured a vaccine by early February 2020.
By March 16, 2020, the shot entered the first phase of clinical trials and by December, it was authorized under emergency use for public distribution. The LA Times reporter also asked Fauci what happens “when the progress of science takes an unexpected turn?”
In Fauci’s answer, he talked about how the outbreak was “dynamic and science is self-correcting.” This was his explanation for the changes in recommendations between January and “When we later learned that the virus is readily spread by aerosol, and that 50% to 60% of the spread was by people who didn’t even know they’re infected, we had to change our recommendations and guidelines.”
This statement was made in December 2022, long after the publication of studies that demonstrated asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 does not happen. In one paper,9 87.9% of pregnant women admitted for delivery tested positive but had no symptoms. A second study10 evaluated data from 9.899 million residents in Wuhan city and found not one person who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive.
When asymptomatic patients were tested for antibodies, 63.3% had a productive infection that resulted in the production of antibodies, but none of their contacts were infected. Information from this large cohort study was published in 2020, yet in 2022, Fauci continued to assert that up to 60% of the spread was through asymptomatic individuals.
In addition to ignoring any responsibility he had in covering up prevention and early treatment, Fauci continues to call the experimental shot “safe and effective,”11 despite data from the FDA and CDC,12 and blames vaccine hesitancy along purely political lines, completely nullifying the idea that people could potentially be able to think for themselves or may not have bought into the massive fear campaign promoted by public health agencies.
Director’s History Riddled With Torture and Criminal Cover-Up
Despite advertising censorship, Robert F Kennedy Jr.'s book “The Real Anthony Fauci” became an immediate bestseller after its release in 2021. The book has since been made into a movie13 in which it's revealed how Fauci turned the NIH into an incubator for pharmaceutical products and essentially sold the country to the drug industry.
In the same year Fauci became director of the NIAID, AIDS was officially discovered by the National Cancer Institute. Fauci quickly realized that by defining AIDS as an infectious disease he could take control over future research and gain more power for the organization, which at the time was floundering since most infectious diseases of concern at that time had already been conquered.
This began an intimate relationship with the drug industry and Fauci’s love affair with toxic drugs. The movie chronicles how he aligned himself with Big Pharma and promoted AZT, a failed cancer drug that was extremely toxic, as the only choice for AIDS treatment. He blocked other treatments, leaving patients no alternative.
In the late 1980s, Fauci arranged for experimental treatment of orphaned children and children in foster homes in seven states. Included in this group were infants who were diagnosed HIV positive using a PCR test and other children who were not. Together they were used as guinea pigs for experimental HIV and AIDS drugs.
Mary Holland, president of Children's Health Defense, explained that if the children refused to swallow the medication, they were force-fed through a gastric tube. Many of these children died and one grave in New York contains at least 80 children, all children of color. These actions clearly broke laws, yet no punishment was ever met out. Big Pharma and Fauci clearly regarded these children as disposable.
In much the same way he discarded less toxic treatment for AIDS, Fauci rejected preventive efforts and early treatments for COVID. These were vilified and/or banned while he promoted remdesivir as the standard of treatment despite having severe adverse side effects.
This clear disregard for human life was driven by government agencies and drug companies that placed profits at the forefront and mainstream media who went along with it. According to the movie, Fauci played a central role in the cover-up of the origins of the virus that causes COVID-19.
In the early days of the pandemic, Fauci, then-NIH director Dr. Francis Collins and Wellcome Trust head Jeremy Ferrara were so concerned that the origin of the virus could be traced back to the Wuhan lab that they used burner phones to communicate.
Although he promotes the vaccines as safe and effective after decades of research into producing the mRNA vaccines, the film shows there have been devastating effects around the world from these poorly tested experimental shots. And, while scientists have worked on this technology for many years, they have never been able to get it to work. When it's effective, it's also toxic.
Man of Science Answers Questions With ‘I Don’t Recall’
November 28, 2021, in an interview with “Face the Nation,” Fauci declared that when people are criticizing Tony Fauci, “they're really criticizing science because I represent science.”14 Nearly one year later to the day, Fauci was deposed by the attorney's general of Missouri and Louisiana in a lawsuit against President Biden for illegally colluding with social media companies to suppress Americans First Amendment rights to free speech.
During the expedited deposition, Fauci answered questions with “I don't recall” 174 times and “I don’t know” an additional 84 times, in addition to which, he stated that it was “impossible” the research he funded in Wuhan could have sparked a pandemic.15 But at the same time, he claimed to be only “vaguely familiar” with the research he funded there. The depositions were released December 5, 2022.16 In a press release, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry stated:17
"Fauci's recent deposition only confirmed what we already knew: federal bureaucrats in collusion with social media companies want to control not only what you think, but especially what you say.
During no time in human history was this more obvious than during the COVID-19 crisis where social engineering tactics were used against the American public, not to limit your exposure to a virus, but to limit your exposure to information that did not fit within a government sanctioned narrative."
One example of the obfuscation that Fauci has exhibited throughout the entire pandemic was in his deposition about the Great Barrington Declaration.18 The Declaration called for focused protection of those who are vulnerable and isolation of people who are infected rather than a nationwide lockdown.
During the deposition, Fauci was asked about emails between himself and Collins that demonstrated they colluded behind the scenes to squash the Declaration. Since they could not defend lockdowns based on science, they resorted to PR, propaganda and smear tactics.
October 8, 2020, Collins wrote in an email to Fauci, "The proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists … seems to be getting a lot of attention … There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises …"
"Don't worry, I got this," Fauci replied. Later, Fauci sent Collins links to newly published articles refuting the focused protection solution. Yet, during the deposition, Fauci could not recall how or when he became aware of the Declaration. He claimed the Declaration was of little to no interest to him.
When he was asked if he knew what Collins was referring to about a quick and devastating takedown, Fauci denied any knowledge and said he believed he was “likely talking about writing a scholarly article to contest some of the premises.” While a scholarly article was never published, mainstream media did quickly publish articles critical of the Barrington Declaration just after Fauci told Collins “I got this.”
His latest deposition and interviews with mainstream media make it appear that one of three things is happening. Either Fauci's memory has been severely affected by the experimental shot in his last days in office, he is in the early stages of dementia or he is continuing to follow a nearly 40-year pattern of deceiving the American public to protect himself and Big Pharma.
Chronic Diseases Skyrocketed Under Fauci’s Rule
Yet another public health failure is the 54% of Americans who have chronic disease today, which is over four times the 11.8% who had chronic disease when Fauci was appointed in 1984.19
In a one-hour interview during “The Corbett Report,”20 Kennedy noted that Fauci should not have allowed this to happen since he has a $6.1 billion budget he distributes to colleges and universities for drug research, $1.7 billion for bioweapons research and 68% of his personal salary comes from military and bioweapons research.
In other words, Fauci was professionally and personally well-funded throughout his 40-year reign at the NIAID.
Using Fear and Chaos to Disable Critical Thinking
While Fauci appears convincing, compassionate and knowledgeable during his interviews, it's necessary to understand that he has been at the head of an orchestrated use of the pandemic to clamp down totalitarian control on the American people.
Throughout this latest health crisis, Fauci’s recommendations have flip-flopped and altered to such a significant degree that they likely contributed to the chaos and spread of fear throughout the public. And public health agencies have used this fear to push the acceptance of an experimental jab that has had significant and devastating consequences in people's lives.
In essence, Fauci was a significant contributor to an epidemic of mental health disease in society. Using a flood of fear and anxiety, people have been pushed into a state of panic that ultimately resulted in making decisions they would not have otherwise considered.
In a publicly accepted evil empire, this would have been Fauci’s crowning achievement — creating an environment where people are willing to double mask, wear masks while swimming, take an experimental jab or voluntarily lock themselves in their homes for weeks at a time when they aren’t sick.
And yet, while this was one end game of the chaos, fear and lies, Fauci has conveniently forgotten much of what happened in the last three years. His testimony is disjointed and filled with “I don’t know” and “I don’t recall.” What has happened to the personification of science? And more importantly, how much influence will this man, who is unable — or more likely unwilling — to recall important facts from the last three years, continue to have over public policy?
Source: Articles http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/01/21/faucis-clueless-farewell.aspx